73 AUTO

Vehicle crime by area

Car crime in Barking and Dagenham

Barking and Dagenham (London borough) averaged 2,259 police-recorded vehicle offences a year in 2024/25 and 2025/26, against 61,622 privately kept licensed cars: a rate of 36.7 per 1,000 cars, 3.04× the England and Wales rate of 12.1. It ranks 19 of 316 local authorities (1 is highest).

Check what a specific car really costs to own

Data to 2026-03-31 · Page updated 2026-09-28 · Publisher: 73 Auto

Offences per 1,000 cars
36.7
2,259 offences a year, 2024/25 and 2025/26
vs England & Wales
3.04×
national rate 12.1
Rank
19 of 316
19 of 32 london boroughs

How Barking and Dagenham compares

Official data. Barking and Dagenham's rate is 369% above the median local authority (7.8), which puts it in the highest tenth of the 316 areas.

Among the 32 london boroughs, it is 7% below the middle one (39.2) and ranks 19: in the middle half of its type. Big-city authorities start from a higher base, so this comparison is fairer than the national one.

Barking and Dagenham vehicle crime rate compared with national and same-type figures
ComparisonPer 1,000 carsBarking and Dagenham vs it
Barking and Dagenham36.7—
England and Wales (all offences ÷ all cars)12.13.04×
Median of 316 areas7.84.69×
All london boroughs pooled38.20.96×
Median of london boroughs39.20.93×

Areas ranked either side

Local authorities ranked immediately above and below Barking and Dagenham
RankAreaTypePer 1,000 cars
16BrentLondon borough39.7
17EnfieldLondon borough38.7
18GreenwichLondon borough38.0
19Barking and DagenhamLondon borough36.7
20HounslowLondon borough35.3
21RedbridgeLondon borough32.1
22HillingdonLondon borough32.1

How the 73 Auto insurance estimate treats Barking and Dagenham

73 Auto estimate, not a quote. Barking and Dagenham's vehicle-crime index is 3.04 (its rate ÷ the national rate). The model caps the index at 2, so it treats Barking and Dagenham like any other area at twice the national rate or more. The collision part of the premium is multiplied by 1.92 (index^0.94) and the theft part by 2.00 (index^1).

Against the UK-average area (index 0.92), that makes the estimate for the reference driver (age 48, clean record, group 20 car) about 84% higher. The estimate uses your postcode district's index, listed below, not the authority figure directly. The area weighting was fitted to 7 published area premiums (leave-one-out error 13% against 19% with no area effect). See how 73 Auto estimates insurance.

Postcode districts mapped to Barking and Dagenham

Districts where most privately kept cars are in Barking and Dagenham. A district's index is the car-weighted average of the authorities it covers; all of these lie within Barking and Dagenham, so they share its index. The last column is the 73 Auto estimate relativity for the reference driver.

Postcode districts whose cars are mostly in Barking and Dagenham, with their vehicle-crime index
DistrictCarsIndexEstimate vs UK-average area
IG1116,5233.041.84×
RM813,7233.031.84×
RM912,0623.041.84×
RM1012,2343.041.84×

Limitations

Police-recorded crime only: unreported offences are missing, and recording practice varies between forces.

The rate is per car registered to a keeper in Barking and Dagenham, not per car on its streets. Where many commuters or visitors park, offences against their cars count here while the cars count elsewhere, which pushes the rate up.

Offences a police force did not assign to an area are shared across its areas by car numbers. Scotland and Northern Ireland are not covered.

Estimate insurance for a car kept in Barking and Dagenham

Enter a UK registration, then add your postcode to see how your district's vehicle-crime index moves that car's insurance estimate. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

Where these figures come from

Figures labelled as 73 Auto estimates are our own analysis of these sources, set out in the methodology and data sources. To report a factual error, see corrections.