73 AUTO

MOT performance

Abarth 500 vs SEAT Mii: MOT pass rates compared

In 2023–2024, 77.2% of 47,520 Abarth 500 MOT tests and 78.3% of 36,559 SEAT Mii tests passed first time — 1.1 points in favour of the SEAT Mii. Once age, mileage and fuel are allowed for, the SEAT Mii fails less often than the Abarth 500: 0.93× against 1.10× the national rate for comparable cars.

47,520 Abarth 500 and 36,559 SEAT Mii MOT tests, 2023–2024

Check a specific car's MOT history and running costs

At a glance

Abarth 500 vs SEAT Mii MOT results
FigureValueBasis
Abarth 500: first-time pass rate77.2%±0.4 pts (95%), n = 47,520
SEAT Mii: first-time pass rate78.3%±0.4 pts (95%), n = 36,559
Abarth 500: failures vs similar cars+10%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
SEAT Mii: failures vs similar cars-7%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Abarth 500: dangerous defect7.0%n = 47,520
SEAT Mii: dangerous defect4.7%n = 36,559
Average age at test6.8 vs 7.7 yearsAbarth 500 vs SEAT Mii

Why the raw pass rates can mislead

The SEAT Mii was tested at an older average age (7.7 years against 6.8), and older cars fail more often whatever they are. That is why the table above also shows failures against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel: it compares the models, not their fleets.

Failure areas side by side

Share of MOT tests that failed on each area, and in brackets how that compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = national average). The clearest difference is seat belts and airbags, where the SEAT Mii fails 5.0 times as often on an adjusted basis.

Abarth 500 vs SEAT Mii MOT failures by area
AreaAbarth 500SEAT Mii
Brakes4.1% (+1%)5.7% (+27%)
Steering0.4% (-64%)0.2% (-88%)
Suspension7.7% (+57%)2.9% (-54%)
Tyres6.0% (+14%)4.2% (-27%)
Road wheels0.1% (-45%)0.1% (-43%)
Lights, reflectors and electrical6.9% (+6%)7.4% (-5%)
Body, chassis and structure1.9% (+28%)2.5% (+41%)
Driver's view of the road3.5% (-9%)3.9% (-3%)
Noise, emissions and leaks2.6% (+56%)1.9% (-4%)
Seat belts and airbags0.4% (-19%)1.8% (+310%)
Registration plates and VIN0.4% (+97%)0.2% (-22%)

Pass rate at the same age

Comparing cars of the same age removes most of the fleet-age effect from the raw rates.

Abarth 500 vs SEAT Mii MOT pass rate by age at test
Age at testAbarth 500SEAT Mii
3-4 years85.7% (n = 9,475)88.2% (n = 3,791)
5-6 years80.2% (n = 12,800)82.8% (n = 5,775)
7-8 years73.9% (n = 10,376)78.4% (n = 9,706)
9-10 years70.4% (n = 4,980)75.0% (n = 12,233)
11-12 years66.3% (n = 3,716)70.4% (n = 4,019)

Most common failure item

  • Abarth 500 · tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (2.30% of tests)
  • SEAT Mii · wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively (2.05% of tests)

MOT results reflect how cars are maintained as well as how they are built, so a gap between two models is a difference in test performance, not proof that one is more reliable. For one car, its own MOT history says more than any average.

Check a specific car

Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT history and what it is likely to cost to own. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

About this data. These are MOT test results, not a measure of mechanical reliability: a car's MOT outcome reflects its condition on the day, which depends on how it has been maintained and driven as well as how it was built. Figures cover class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), outcomes pass, fail and pass after rectification at the station; vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test. Tests from 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30. “Compared with similar cars” means compared with the national rate for cars of the same age, mileage band and fuel. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Makes and models are matched to 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue; tests that can't be matched are left out rather than guessed. See how the MOT figures are produced.