73 AUTO

MOT performance

BMW i3 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo: MOT pass rates compared

In 2023–2024, 87.5% of 43,497 BMW i3 MOT tests and 61.9% of 39,892 Alfa Romeo MiTo tests passed first time — 25.6 points in favour of the BMW i3. Once age, mileage and fuel are allowed for, the BMW i3 fails less often than the Alfa Romeo MiTo: 0.83× against 1.11× the national rate for comparable cars.

43,497 BMW i3 and 39,892 Alfa Romeo MiTo MOT tests, 2023–2024

Check a specific car's MOT history and running costs

At a glance

BMW i3 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo MOT results
FigureValueBasis
BMW i3: first-time pass rate87.5%±0.3 pts (95%), n = 43,497
Alfa Romeo MiTo: first-time pass rate61.9%±0.5 pts (95%), n = 39,892
BMW i3: failures vs similar cars-17%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Alfa Romeo MiTo: failures vs similar cars+11%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
BMW i3: dangerous defect3.9%n = 43,497
Alfa Romeo MiTo: dangerous defect10.8%n = 39,892
Average age at test4.9 vs 10.9 yearsBMW i3 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo

Why the raw pass rates can mislead

The Alfa Romeo MiTo was tested at an older average age (10.9 years against 4.9), and older cars fail more often whatever they are. That is why the table above also shows failures against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel: it compares the models, not their fleets.

Failure areas side by side

Share of MOT tests that failed on each area, and in brackets how that compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = national average). The clearest difference is steering, where the Alfa Romeo MiTo fails 5.1 times as often on an adjusted basis.

BMW i3 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo MOT failures by area
AreaBMW i3Alfa Romeo MiTo
Brakes0.8% (-55%)10.8% (+41%)
Steering0.1% (-76%)2.9% (+23%)
Suspension0.7% (-67%)14.6% (+22%)
Tyres5.6% (-13%)7.8% (+12%)
Road wheels0.5% (+183%)0.3% (-21%)
Lights, reflectors and electrical3.3% (-12%)11.7% (-18%)
Body, chassis and structure0.2% (-37%)5.2% (+30%)
Driver's view of the road2.4% (-19%)5.8% (+9%)
Noise, emissions and leaks0.3% (+140%)5.6% (+41%)
Seat belts and airbags0.5% (+105%)1.1% (+17%)
Registration plates and VIN0.2% (-3%)0.4% (+17%)

Pass rate at the same age

Comparing cars of the same age removes most of the fleet-age effect from the raw rates.

BMW i3 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo MOT pass rate by age at test
Age at testBMW i3Alfa Romeo MiTo
3-4 years89.8% (n = 15,185)77.8% (n = 334)
5-6 years87.6% (n = 11,518)71.3% (n = 2,527)
7-8 years85.0% (n = 8,080)67.1% (n = 6,027)
9-10 years82.4% (n = 2,760)62.8% (n = 6,908)

Most common failure item

  • BMW i3 · condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (1.95% of tests)
  • Alfa Romeo MiTo · coil spring: fractured or broken (7.75% of tests)

MOT results reflect how cars are maintained as well as how they are built, so a gap between two models is a difference in test performance, not proof that one is more reliable. For one car, its own MOT history says more than any average.

Check a specific car

Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT history and what it is likely to cost to own. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

About this data. These are MOT test results, not a measure of mechanical reliability: a car's MOT outcome reflects its condition on the day, which depends on how it has been maintained and driven as well as how it was built. Figures cover class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), outcomes pass, fail and pass after rectification at the station; vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test. Tests from 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30. “Compared with similar cars” means compared with the national rate for cars of the same age, mileage band and fuel. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Makes and models are matched to 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue; tests that can't be matched are left out rather than guessed. See how the MOT figures are produced.