73 AUTO

MOT performance

Hyundai Kona vs MG ZS: MOT pass rates compared

In 2023–2024, 87.8% of 73,144 Hyundai Kona MOT tests and 83.3% of 71,594 MG ZS tests passed first time — 4.5 points in favour of the Hyundai Kona. Once age, mileage and fuel are allowed for, the Hyundai Kona fails less often than the MG ZS: 0.97× against 1.19× the national rate for comparable cars.

73,144 Hyundai Kona and 71,594 MG ZS MOT tests, 2023–2024

Check a specific car's MOT history and running costs

At a glance

Hyundai Kona vs MG ZS MOT results
FigureValueBasis
Hyundai Kona: first-time pass rate87.8%±0.2 pts (95%), n = 73,144
MG ZS: first-time pass rate83.3%±0.3 pts (95%), n = 71,594
Hyundai Kona: failures vs similar cars-3%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
MG ZS: failures vs similar cars+19%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Hyundai Kona: dangerous defect4.0%n = 73,144
MG ZS: dangerous defect4.7%n = 71,594
Average age at test3.3 vs 3.8 yearsHyundai Kona vs MG ZS

Why the raw pass rates can mislead

The MG ZS was tested at an older average age (3.8 years against 3.3), and older cars fail more often whatever they are. That is why the table above also shows failures against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel: it compares the models, not their fleets.

Failure areas side by side

Share of MOT tests that failed on each area, and in brackets how that compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = national average). The clearest difference is steering, where the MG ZS fails 4.7 times as often on an adjusted basis.

Hyundai Kona vs MG ZS MOT failures by area
AreaHyundai KonaMG ZS
Brakes1.7% (+13%)5.2% (+133%)
Steering0.0% (-77%)0.4% (+6%)
Suspension0.5% (-51%)1.7% (+16%)
Tyres4.9% (-12%)4.7% (-13%)
Road wheels0.1% (-65%)0.1% (-55%)
Lights, reflectors and electrical2.6% (Same)5.2% (+52%)
Body, chassis and structure0.2% (-45%)0.7% (+25%)
Driver's view of the road3.6% (+28%)2.0% (-36%)
Noise, emissions and leaks0.4% (+11%)1.5% (+133%)
Seat belts and airbags0.1% (-64%)0.5% (+17%)
Registration plates and VIN0.1% (-47%)0.2% (-28%)
Speedometer and driving controls0.0% (+133%)0.0% (+11%)

Pass rate at the same age

Comparing cars of the same age removes most of the fleet-age effect from the raw rates.

Hyundai Kona vs MG ZS MOT pass rate by age at test
Age at testHyundai KonaMG ZS
3-4 years87.9% (n = 38,215)83.8% (n = 38,288)
5-6 years86.5% (n = 11,494)76.0% (n = 9,772)

Most common failure item

  • Hyundai Kona · wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.00% of tests)
  • MG ZS · headlamp: not working on dipped beam (2.21% of tests)

MOT results reflect how cars are maintained as well as how they are built, so a gap between two models is a difference in test performance, not proof that one is more reliable. For one car, its own MOT history says more than any average.

Check a specific car

Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT history and what it is likely to cost to own. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

About this data. These are MOT test results, not a measure of mechanical reliability: a car's MOT outcome reflects its condition on the day, which depends on how it has been maintained and driven as well as how it was built. Figures cover class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), outcomes pass, fail and pass after rectification at the station; vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test. Tests from 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30. “Compared with similar cars” means compared with the national rate for cars of the same age, mileage band and fuel. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Makes and models are matched to 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue; tests that can't be matched are left out rather than guessed. See how the MOT figures are produced.