73 AUTO

MOT performance

Jaguar XE vs Volvo V60: MOT pass rates compared

In 2023–2024, 81.3% of 87,969 Jaguar XE MOT tests and 78.1% of 77,102 Volvo V60 tests passed first time — 3.1 points in favour of the Jaguar XE. Once age, mileage and fuel are allowed for, the Volvo V60 fails less often than the Jaguar XE: 0.85× against 0.92× the national rate for comparable cars.

87,969 Jaguar XE and 77,102 Volvo V60 MOT tests, 2023–2024

Check a specific car's MOT history and running costs

At a glance

Jaguar XE vs Volvo V60 MOT results
FigureValueBasis
Jaguar XE: first-time pass rate81.3%±0.3 pts (95%), n = 87,969
Volvo V60: first-time pass rate78.1%±0.3 pts (95%), n = 77,102
Jaguar XE: failures vs similar cars-8%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Volvo V60: failures vs similar cars-15%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Jaguar XE: dangerous defect7.3%n = 87,969
Volvo V60: dangerous defect9.3%n = 77,102
Average age at test6.1 vs 7.1 yearsJaguar XE vs Volvo V60

Why the raw pass rates can mislead

The Volvo V60 was tested at an older average age (7.1 years against 6.1), and older cars fail more often whatever they are. That is why the table above also shows failures against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel: it compares the models, not their fleets. Here the adjustment reverses the raw result: the Volvo V60 has the lower pass rate but fails less often than comparable cars.

Failure areas side by side

Share of MOT tests that failed on each area, and in brackets how that compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = national average). The clearest difference is steering, where the Volvo V60 fails 7.4 times as often on an adjusted basis.

Jaguar XE vs Volvo V60 MOT failures by area
AreaJaguar XEVolvo V60
Brakes3.9% (-8%)4.9% (-13%)
Steering0.1% (-84%)1.8% (+16%)
Suspension1.9% (-55%)3.3% (-53%)
Tyres7.1% (+17%)8.2% (+20%)
Road wheels0.4% (+38%)0.3% (-22%)
Lights, reflectors and electrical4.9% (-15%)4.8% (-47%)
Body, chassis and structure0.3% (-74%)1.2% (-48%)
Driver's view of the road3.2% (-6%)3.0% (-27%)
Noise, emissions and leaks1.6% (-5%)1.7% (-26%)
Seat belts and airbags0.6% (+34%)0.3% (-54%)
Registration plates and VIN0.3% (+5%)0.3% (-22%)

Pass rate at the same age

Comparing cars of the same age removes most of the fleet-age effect from the raw rates.

Jaguar XE vs Volvo V60 MOT pass rate by age at test
Age at testJaguar XEVolvo V60
3-4 years83.4% (n = 13,985)85.9% (n = 15,521)
5-6 years82.3% (n = 31,992)81.4% (n = 13,819)
7-8 years79.6% (n = 37,478)77.6% (n = 13,816)
9-10 years78.4% (n = 2,517)73.1% (n = 14,397)

Most common failure item

  • Jaguar XE · stop lamp: not working (2.58% of tests)
  • Volvo V60 · brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick (3.31% of tests)

MOT results reflect how cars are maintained as well as how they are built, so a gap between two models is a difference in test performance, not proof that one is more reliable. For one car, its own MOT history says more than any average.

Check a specific car

Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT history and what it is likely to cost to own. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

About this data. These are MOT test results, not a measure of mechanical reliability: a car's MOT outcome reflects its condition on the day, which depends on how it has been maintained and driven as well as how it was built. Figures cover class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), outcomes pass, fail and pass after rectification at the station; vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test. Tests from 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30. “Compared with similar cars” means compared with the national rate for cars of the same age, mileage band and fuel. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Makes and models are matched to 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue; tests that can't be matched are left out rather than guessed. See how the MOT figures are produced.