MOT performance
Mazda CX-30 vs Jeep Compass: MOT pass rates compared
In 2023–2024, 92.3% of 21,474 Mazda CX-30 MOT tests and 76.6% of 21,014 Jeep Compass tests passed first time — 15.7 points in favour of the Mazda CX-30. Once age, mileage and fuel are allowed for, the Mazda CX-30 fails less often than the Jeep Compass: 0.70× against 1.22× the national rate for comparable cars.
21,474 Mazda CX-30 and 21,014 Jeep Compass MOT tests, 2023–2024
Check a specific car's MOT history and running costsAt a glance
| Figure | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-30: first-time pass rate | 92.3% | ±0.4 pts (95%), n = 21,474 |
| Jeep Compass: first-time pass rate | 76.6% | ±0.6 pts (95%), n = 21,014 |
| Mazda CX-30: failures vs similar cars | -30% | same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00 |
| Jeep Compass: failures vs similar cars | +22% | same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00 |
| Mazda CX-30: dangerous defect | 2.3% | n = 21,474 |
| Jeep Compass: dangerous defect | 6.8% | n = 21,014 |
| Average age at test | 2.5 vs 5.5 years | Mazda CX-30 vs Jeep Compass |
Why the raw pass rates can mislead
The Jeep Compass was tested at an older average age (5.5 years against 2.5), and older cars fail more often whatever they are. That is why the table above also shows failures against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel: it compares the models, not their fleets.
Failure areas side by side
Share of MOT tests that failed on each area, and in brackets how that compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = national average). The clearest difference is road wheels, where the Jeep Compass fails 6.5 times as often on an adjusted basis.
| Area | Mazda CX-30 | Jeep Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 1.3% (-26%) | 3.4% (-12%) |
| Steering | 0.0% (-70%) | 1.0% (+20%) |
| Suspension | 0.4% (-24%) | 6.8% (+75%) |
| Tyres | 3.1% (-28%) | 6.7% (+23%) |
| Road wheels | 0.0% (-84%) | 0.3% (+6%) |
| Lights, reflectors and electrical | 1.1% (-51%) | 6.2% (+7%) |
| Body, chassis and structure | 0.1% (-63%) | 0.9% (-33%) |
| Driver's view of the road | 2.0% (-26%) | 6.3% (+72%) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 0.6% (+66%) | 2.5% (+75%) |
| Seat belts and airbags | 0.1% (-83%) | 0.5% (-6%) |
| Registration plates and VIN | 0.1% (-65%) | 0.2% (-12%) |
Pass rate at the same age
Comparing cars of the same age removes most of the fleet-age effect from the raw rates.
| Age at test | Mazda CX-30 | Jeep Compass |
|---|---|---|
| 3-4 years | 91.0% (n = 9,551) | 82.7% (n = 9,068) |
Most common failure item
- Mazda CX-30 · condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (1.46% of tests)
- Jeep Compass · wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively (4.06% of tests)
MOT results reflect how cars are maintained as well as how they are built, so a gap between two models is a difference in test performance, not proof that one is more reliable. For one car, its own MOT history says more than any average.
Check a specific car
Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT history and what it is likely to cost to own. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.
UK number plate or 17-character VIN
About this data. These are MOT test results, not a measure of mechanical reliability: a car's MOT outcome reflects its condition on the day, which depends on how it has been maintained and driven as well as how it was built. Figures cover class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), outcomes pass, fail and pass after rectification at the station; vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test. Tests from 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30. “Compared with similar cars” means compared with the national rate for cars of the same age, mileage band and fuel. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Makes and models are matched to 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue; tests that can't be matched are left out rather than guessed. See how the MOT figures are produced.