73 AUTO

MOT performance

SEAT Ateca vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar: MOT pass rates compared

In 2023–2024, 88.6% of 87,288 SEAT Ateca MOT tests and 84.2% of 58,985 Land Rover Range Rover Velar tests passed first time — 4.3 points in favour of the SEAT Ateca. Once age, mileage and fuel are allowed for, the SEAT Ateca fails less often than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar: 0.70× against 0.95× the national rate for comparable cars.

87,288 SEAT Ateca and 58,985 Land Rover Range Rover Velar MOT tests, 2023–2024

Check a specific car's MOT history and running costs

At a glance

SEAT Ateca vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar MOT results
FigureValueBasis
SEAT Ateca: first-time pass rate88.6%±0.2 pts (95%), n = 87,288
Land Rover Range Rover Velar: first-time pass rate84.2%±0.3 pts (95%), n = 58,985
SEAT Ateca: failures vs similar cars-30%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Land Rover Range Rover Velar: failures vs similar cars-5%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
SEAT Ateca: dangerous defect4.9%n = 87,288
Land Rover Range Rover Velar: dangerous defect4.5%n = 58,985
Average age at test4.3 vs 4.3 yearsSEAT Ateca vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Why the raw pass rates can mislead

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar was tested at an older average age (4.3 years against 4.3), and older cars fail more often whatever they are. That is why the table above also shows failures against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel: it compares the models, not their fleets.

Failure areas side by side

Share of MOT tests that failed on each area, and in brackets how that compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = national average). The clearest difference is steering, where the Land Rover Range Rover Velar fails 32.3 times as often on an adjusted basis.

SEAT Ateca vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar MOT failures by area
AreaSEAT AtecaLand Rover Range Rover Velar
Brakes2.4% (-24%)2.9% (-12%)
Steering0.1% (-86%)1.3% (+339%)
Suspension0.9% (-54%)0.6% (-67%)
Tyres4.6% (-16%)4.6% (-15%)
Road wheels0.1% (-29%)0.2% (-18%)
Lights, reflectors and electrical2.1% (-47%)2.6% (-35%)
Body, chassis and structure0.2% (-75%)0.2% (-64%)
Driver's view of the road1.7% (-48%)4.5% (+38%)
Noise, emissions and leaks0.6% (-42%)1.7% (+21%)
Seat belts and airbags0.6% (+50%)0.3% (-28%)
Registration plates and VIN0.2% (-24%)0.7% (+150%)

Pass rate at the same age

Comparing cars of the same age removes most of the fleet-age effect from the raw rates.

SEAT Ateca vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar MOT pass rate by age at test
Age at testSEAT AtecaLand Rover Range Rover Velar
3-4 years90.0% (n = 36,336)84.8% (n = 27,328)
5-6 years87.1% (n = 32,007)83.7% (n = 25,789)
7-8 years85.6% (n = 6,253)81.8% (n = 932)

Most common failure item

MOT results reflect how cars are maintained as well as how they are built, so a gap between two models is a difference in test performance, not proof that one is more reliable. For one car, its own MOT history says more than any average.

Check a specific car

Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT history and what it is likely to cost to own. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

About this data. These are MOT test results, not a measure of mechanical reliability: a car's MOT outcome reflects its condition on the day, which depends on how it has been maintained and driven as well as how it was built. Figures cover class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), outcomes pass, fail and pass after rectification at the station; vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test. Tests from 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30. “Compared with similar cars” means compared with the national rate for cars of the same age, mileage band and fuel. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Makes and models are matched to 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue; tests that can't be matched are left out rather than guessed. See how the MOT figures are produced.