73 AUTO

MOT performance

Volkswagen T-Roc vs Volvo XC40: MOT pass rates compared

In 2023–2024, 91.0% of 130,619 Volkswagen T-Roc MOT tests and 90.2% of 119,449 Volvo XC40 tests passed first time — 0.8 points in favour of the Volkswagen T-Roc. Once age, mileage and fuel are allowed for, the Volkswagen T-Roc fails less often than the Volvo XC40: 0.65× against 0.75× the national rate for comparable cars.

130,619 Volkswagen T-Roc and 119,449 Volvo XC40 MOT tests, 2023–2024

Check a specific car's MOT history and running costs

At a glance

Volkswagen T-Roc vs Volvo XC40 MOT results
FigureValueBasis
Volkswagen T-Roc: first-time pass rate91.0%±0.2 pts (95%), n = 130,619
Volvo XC40: first-time pass rate90.2%±0.2 pts (95%), n = 119,449
Volkswagen T-Roc: failures vs similar cars-35%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Volvo XC40: failures vs similar cars-25%same age, mileage and fuel = 1.00
Volkswagen T-Roc: dangerous defect3.2%n = 130,619
Volvo XC40: dangerous defect5.0%n = 119,449
Average age at test3.5 vs 3.1 yearsVolkswagen T-Roc vs Volvo XC40

Why the raw pass rates can mislead

The Volkswagen T-Roc was tested at an older average age (3.5 years against 3.1), and older cars fail more often whatever they are. That is why the table above also shows failures against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel: it compares the models, not their fleets.

Failure areas side by side

Share of MOT tests that failed on each area, and in brackets how that compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = national average). The clearest difference is brakes, where the Volvo XC40 fails 2.9 times as often on an adjusted basis.

Volkswagen T-Roc vs Volvo XC40 MOT failures by area
AreaVolkswagen T-RocVolvo XC40
Brakes1.4% (-44%)3.2% (+61%)
Steering0.0% (-86%)0.0% (-87%)
Suspension0.2% (-80%)0.4% (-55%)
Tyres4.0% (-18%)4.1% (-19%)
Road wheels0.1% (-49%)0.0% (-74%)
Lights, reflectors and electrical1.3% (-58%)1.2% (-57%)
Body, chassis and structure0.1% (-75%)0.2% (-37%)
Driver's view of the road1.9% (-40%)1.2% (-59%)
Noise, emissions and leaks0.5% (-30%)0.3% (-48%)
Seat belts and airbags0.6% (+63%)0.2% (-36%)
Registration plates and VIN0.1% (-32%)0.1% (-29%)

Pass rate at the same age

Comparing cars of the same age removes most of the fleet-age effect from the raw rates.

Volkswagen T-Roc vs Volvo XC40 MOT pass rate by age at test
Age at testVolkswagen T-RocVolvo XC40
3-4 years91.3% (n = 73,588)90.3% (n = 65,474)
5-6 years89.0% (n = 26,227)87.7% (n = 11,959)

Most common failure item

  • Volkswagen T-Roc · condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (1.56% of tests)
  • Volvo XC40 · brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick (2.88% of tests)

MOT results reflect how cars are maintained as well as how they are built, so a gap between two models is a difference in test performance, not proof that one is more reliable. For one car, its own MOT history says more than any average.

Check a specific car

Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT history and what it is likely to cost to own. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

About this data. These are MOT test results, not a measure of mechanical reliability: a car's MOT outcome reflects its condition on the day, which depends on how it has been maintained and driven as well as how it was built. Figures cover class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), outcomes pass, fail and pass after rectification at the station; vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test. Tests from 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30. “Compared with similar cars” means compared with the national rate for cars of the same age, mileage band and fuel. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Makes and models are matched to 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue; tests that can't be matched are left out rather than guessed. See how the MOT figures are produced.