MOT failures by make

SEAT MOT faults: which failures are more common than on similar cars

Across 1,108,744 MOT tests of SEAT cars in 2023–2024, 3 of the make's most common failure items stand out against cars of the same age, mileage and fuel, led by “Shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak” at 2.11× the comparable rate. Overall SEATs passed 73.9% of tests and failed 1.00× as often as comparable cars.

Check what a specific car really costs to own

Data to 2024-12-30 · Page updated 2026-09-28 · Publisher: 73 Auto

SEAT MOT tests: 1,108,744; 577,726 cars, 2023–2024
Initial pass rate: 73.9%; DVSA results, retests excluded
Faults that stand out: 3; passed the make × item gate

Failures more common on SEATs than on similar cars

Each links to the model-by-model and age breakdown for SEAT.

Shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak · 2.11× · 1.62% of tests
Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn · 1.76× · 1.84% of tests

Failures less common on SEATs

Common failure items where SEATs do clearly better than comparable cars, beyond the make's overall level.

Position lamp: not working · 0.61× · 1.29% of tests

SEAT’s most common MOT failure items

Ranked by how many SEAT tests failed on each item. The last column compares with cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (1.00 = the same rate).

SEAT: most common MOT failure items with observed ÷ expected
Defect item	Rank	Tests failing	Share	vs similar cars
Tread depth: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm	#1	31,095	2.80%	1.14×
Coil spring: fractured or broken	#2	24,171	2.18%	1.06×
Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick	#3	21,204	1.91%	0.97×
Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn	#4	20,408	1.84%	1.76×
Washers: provides insufficient washer liquid	#5	18,156	1.64%	1.21×
Shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak	#6	17,909	1.62%	2.11×
Condition: has ply or cords exposed	#7	16,588	1.50%	1.17×
Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively	#8	16,212	1.46%	0.72×
Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect	#9	15,335	1.38%	1.31×
Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords	#10	15,023	1.35%	1.00×
Headlamp aim: too low	#11	14,826	1.34%	1.19×
Position lamp: not working	#12	14,253	1.29%	0.61×
Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements	#13	13,335	1.20%	1.35×
Washers: not working	#14	12,604	1.14%	1.50×
Headlamp: not working on dipped beam	#15	11,677	1.05%	0.79×

Only the 150 most common national MOT failure items are compared; a rank counts every failure item recorded on the make.

How to use this

The list shows what a SEAT is more likely than other cars to fail on, which is where to look on a pre-MOT check or a used-car inspection. The model pages break the same data down further — see SEAT MOT pass rates by model.

Limitations

Official data: DVSA anonymised MOT results (2023–2024). 73 Auto analysis: expected failures apply the national rate of each item for the test's age, mileage band and fuel. MOT results reflect maintenance and use as well as design; they do not rank makes by reliability.

Check a SEAT’s MOT history before you buy

Enter a registration to see which of these faults that particular car has failed or been advised on, and what it costs to run. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

Where these figures come from

Anonymised MOT tests and results (2023 and 2024) — Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA). Open Government Licence v3.0.

Figures labelled as 73 Auto estimates are our own analysis of these sources, set out in the methodology and data sources. To report a factual error, see corrections.