MOT failures by make
Volvo MOT failures for “Ball joint: ball joint excessively worn”
Volvo cars failed their MOT on “Ball joint: ball joint excessively worn” in 0.91% of 1,161,658 tests in 2023–2024 (10,577 tests) — 38% less often than comparable cars of the same age, mileage and fuel, which would have failed on it in about 1.47% of tests. It is the number 14 most common failure item on Volvos.
Data to 2024-12-30 · Page updated 2026-09-28 · Publisher: 73 Auto
- Volvo tests failing on it
- 0.91%
- 10,577 of 1,161,658 tests, 2023–2024
- Comparable cars
- 1.47%
- national rate at the same age, mileage and fuel
- Observed ÷ expected
- 0.62×
- 73 Auto analysis · rank #14 for Volvo
How unusual this is for the make
Across all MOT failures, Volvos fail 7% less often than comparable cars. On this item the gap is 0.67× narrower than that overall level, so it is a genuine Volvo pattern rather than a reflection of how often the make fails in general. It is a major defect in the suspension part of the test. Nationally it appears on 1.43% of MOT tests.
Volvo models and “Ball joint: ball joint excessively worn”
The Volvo XC40 is least affected (0.05× comparable cars); the Volvo V50 most (0.99×). Every model listed is below the national rate, so the pattern runs across the range. Model rows compare with cars of the same age and fuel.
| Model | Tests | Failed on it | vs similar cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volvo V50 | 63,673 | 2.70% | 0.99× |
| Volvo XC90 | 140,093 | 1.46% | 0.94× |
| Volvo S40 | 39,163 | 2.14% | 0.86× |
| Volvo C30 | 47,168 | 1.97% | 0.76× |
| Volvo C70 | 16,441 | 1.78% | 0.74× |
| Volvo V70 | 86,581 | 1.76% | 0.74× |
| Volvo XC70 | 35,465 | 1.38% | 0.57× |
| Volvo S60 | 41,745 | 0.99% | 0.55× |
| Volvo V40 | 199,307 | 0.52% | 0.48× |
| Volvo S80 | 14,890 | 1.07% | 0.44× |
| Volvo S90 | 15,103 | 0.14% | 0.40× |
| Volvo V60 | 77,102 | 0.41% | 0.37× |
| Volvo V90 | 30,109 | 0.11% | 0.36× |
| Volvo XC60 | 216,923 | 0.20% | 0.19× |
| Volvo XC40 | 119,449 | 0.01% | 0.05× |
By age at test
The difference is most pronounced at 9-10 years old: 0.58% of Volvo tests against 1.83% for comparable cars.
| Age (years) | Volvo tests | Volvo | Comparable cars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-4 | 192,276 | 0.06% | 0.13% |
| 5-6 | 172,133 | 0.24% | 0.44% |
| 7-8 | 161,144 | 0.46% | 1.13% |
| 9-10 | 127,771 | 0.58% | 1.83% |
| 11-12 | 109,664 | 1.16% | 2.59% |
| 13-15 | 146,522 | 1.83% | 2.93% |
| 16+ | 175,630 | 2.62% | 2.72% |
Limitations
Official data: DVSA's anonymised MOT results (2023–2024), class 4 initial tests, cars at least 2.5 years old. 73 Auto analysis: the comparison rate applies the national rate of this item for each test's own age, mileage band and fuel to the Volvo tests. An MOT result reflects maintenance, mileage and how a car is used as well as its design, so this is not a measure of which make is most reliable. The wording of the defect is DVSA's.
Has this Volvo failed on it before?
Enter a registration to see that car’s own MOT history, advisories and the running costs 73 Auto expects. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.
UK number plate or 17-character VIN
Where these figures come from
- Anonymised MOT tests and results (2023 and 2024) — Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA). Open Government Licence v3.0.
Figures labelled as 73 Auto estimates are our own analysis of these sources, set out in the methodology and data sources. To report a factual error, see corrections.