73 AUTO

73 Auto Research · MOT statistics

Which car makes fail the MOT most? A ranking adjusted for age and mileage

Allowing for age, mileage and fuel, BMW had the fewest MOT failures of the 21 makes with over a million tests in 2023–24 (ratio 0.76: failed 24% less often than comparable cars) and Renault the most (1.30). Across all 45 makes ranked, from 65,256,444 DVSA MOT tests, the range ran from Bentley (0.36) to SsangYong (1.54).

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT data, 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30 (n = 65,256,444 tests). Download the data (CSV)

Check what a specific car really costs to own

Data to 2024-12-30 · Page updated 2026-09-28 · Publisher: 73 Auto

Key findings

  1. 73 Auto analysisOf the 21 car makes with over a million MOT tests in 2023–24, BMW cars failed 24% less often than comparable cars of the same age, mileage and fuel (73 Auto analysis of 3,694,719 DVSA tests).
  2. 73 Auto analysisRenault cars failed 30% more often than comparable cars of the same age, mileage and fuel, the highest of the makes with over a million MOT tests (1,998,608 tests, 2023–24).
  3. 73 Auto analysisBentley had the lowest adjusted MOT failure ratio of all 45 makes ranked (0.36, 44,444 tests); SsangYong had the highest (1.54, 47,647 tests).
  4. 73 Auto analysisTesla ranks 5th of 45 makes on raw first-time pass rate (82.8%) but 29th once its cars' young average age (3.5 years) is allowed for.
  5. 73 Auto analysisSaab climbs from 39th on raw pass rate to 12th of 45 after adjustment: its cars average 16.9 years old at test.
  6. 73 Auto analysisSsangYong cars had dangerous defects 56% more often than comparable cars at MOT (ratio 1.56), the highest of the 45 makes; Aston Martin the lowest (0.31).

At a glance

Which car makes fail the MOT most? A ranking adjusted for age and mileage: headline figures
FigureValueBasisType
Makes ranked4520,000+ tests each73 Auto analysis
Tests behind the ranking65,256,4442023–24DVSA data
Lowest ratio, 1,000,000+ testsBMW 0.76n = 3,694,71973 Auto analysis
Highest ratio, 1,000,000+ testsRenault 1.30n = 1,998,60873 Auto analysis

73 Auto analysis

Figures 73 Auto derived from the same records: adjusted ratios, intervals and rankings, explained in the method below.

Every make, ranked after adjustment

73 Auto analysisLowest ratio first. The raw pass rate and its rank are DVSA counts; the ratios, their intervals and the adjusted rank are 73 Auto analysis.

Car makes ranked by adjusted MOT failure ratio, 2023–24
MakeAdjusted rankTestsAvg ageFirst-time passRaw rankFailures vs similar cars95% intervalDangerous vs similar cars
Bentley144,44412.690.8%20.360.35–0.370.46
Aston Martin243,57112.391.4%10.390.37–0.400.31
Porsche3346,55011.886.5%30.500.50–0.510.51
Lexus4324,7739.683.2%40.700.70–0.710.82
BMW53,694,7199.278.5%60.760.76–0.760.91
Subaru6120,12713.073.5%200.760.76–0.770.64
Audi73,386,5398.977.9%100.770.77–0.770.88
Land Rover81,857,53310.476.5%120.800.80–0.800.80
Jaguar9700,0509.678.3%80.810.81–0.820.94
Mercedes-Benz103,425,1499.076.7%110.860.86–0.860.99
Honda111,860,16411.772.0%250.860.86–0.860.91
Saab12106,67016.963.0%390.860.86–0.870.88
MINI131,600,6109.476.2%140.860.86–0.870.87
Skoda141,551,9578.376.4%130.890.89–0.890.85
Volvo151,161,6589.373.6%190.930.92–0.931.06
Volkswagen166,099,38610.072.1%230.940.93–0.940.89
Toyota173,315,37510.374.0%150.940.94–0.940.86
Mazda181,069,09910.272.1%240.960.96–0.960.99
London Taxis International1928,41410.462.6%410.990.97–1.010.71
Mitsubishi20600,30610.071.3%271.000.99–1.000.91
SEAT211,108,7447.973.9%171.001.00–1.001.07
Daihatsu2235,81217.861.2%431.000.99–1.020.96
Suzuki23867,7379.673.1%211.001.00–1.010.92
Alfa Romeo24146,33211.067.6%341.021.01–1.031.15
Jeep25141,4009.073.9%161.021.01–1.030.91
Chrysler2637,65714.460.8%441.031.02–1.051.13
Smart27177,31010.571.6%261.061.05–1.071.00
Ford288,887,6069.668.4%301.071.07–1.071.08
Tesla29129,2323.582.8%51.071.06–1.091.51
Abarth3056,4756.678.4%71.081.06–1.101.21
Hyundai311,757,5848.373.1%221.081.08–1.091.13
MG32194,9558.878.2%91.081.07–1.091.01
Rover3365,60222.564.0%381.081.07–1.101.02
Kia341,822,1297.773.8%181.091.09–1.101.21
Nissan353,269,9259.468.2%311.131.12–1.131.09
Isuzu3688,0978.967.9%321.131.12–1.150.79
Vauxhall376,000,2579.865.6%371.141.14–1.141.09
Fiat381,581,92210.167.9%331.161.16–1.171.12
Peugeot392,871,4479.766.0%361.191.19–1.191.05
Citroen402,048,7779.863.0%401.261.26–1.261.14
Chevrolet41123,72712.854.6%451.291.28–1.301.32
Renault421,998,6089.961.9%421.301.30–1.301.20
Dacia43373,8366.071.1%281.461.45–1.471.11
DS4486,5326.070.5%291.511.49–1.531.25
SsangYong4547,6476.667.0%351.541.52–1.561.56
Makes whose 95% intervals overlap cannot be told apart with confidence. Intervals treat the observed failure count as Poisson; they do not capture differences in upkeep or use.

Makes with over a million tests

73 Auto analysis

Car makes with over one million MOT tests, 2023–24
MakeTestsFirst-time passFailures vs similar carsReading
BMW3,694,71978.5%0.76failed 24% less often than comparable cars
Audi3,386,53977.9%0.77failed 23% less often than comparable cars
Land Rover1,857,53376.5%0.80failed 20% less often than comparable cars
Mercedes-Benz3,425,14976.7%0.86failed 14% less often than comparable cars
Honda1,860,16472.0%0.86failed 14% less often than comparable cars
MINI1,600,61076.2%0.86failed 14% less often than comparable cars
Skoda1,551,95776.4%0.89failed 11% less often than comparable cars
Volvo1,161,65873.6%0.93failed 7% less often than comparable cars
Volkswagen6,099,38672.1%0.94failed 6% less often than comparable cars
Toyota3,315,37574.0%0.94failed 6% less often than comparable cars
Mazda1,069,09972.1%0.96failed about as often as comparable cars
SEAT1,108,74473.9%1.00failed about as often as comparable cars
Ford8,887,60668.4%1.07failed 7% more often than comparable cars
Hyundai1,757,58473.1%1.08failed 8% more often than comparable cars
Kia1,822,12973.8%1.09failed 9% more often than comparable cars
Nissan3,269,92568.2%1.13failed 13% more often than comparable cars
Vauxhall6,000,25765.6%1.14failed 14% more often than comparable cars
Fiat1,581,92267.9%1.16failed 16% more often than comparable cars
Peugeot2,871,44766.0%1.19failed 19% more often than comparable cars
Citroen2,048,77763.0%1.26failed 26% more often than comparable cars
Renault1,998,60861.9%1.30failed 30% more often than comparable cars

Dangerous defects by make, adjusted

73 Auto analysisThe five lowest and five highest adjusted ratios.

Car makes by adjusted dangerous-defect ratio
MakeTestsDangerous-defect rateDangerous vs similar cars
Aston Martin43,5711.5%0.31
Bentley44,4442.6%0.46
Porsche346,5503.4%0.51
Subaru120,1275.7%0.64
London Taxis International28,4147.9%0.71
Kia1,822,1298.2%1.21
DS86,5327.5%1.25
Chevrolet123,72711.3%1.32
Tesla129,23210.3%1.51
SsangYong47,64710.2%1.56

Method

Source: DVSA's anonymised MOT tests and results for 2023-01-01 to 2024-12-30, published under the Open Government Licence v3.0. 73 Auto counted every record itself; no figure is taken from a secondary report.

Scope: class 4 vehicles (cars and light vans), normal tests only (retests excluded), vehicles at least 2.5 years old at test, whose make matches 73 Auto's vehicle catalogue: 65,477,892 tests in 2023–24.

First-time pass rate: the share of normal tests with the result Pass. A test where a defect was fixed at the station and the car passed the same day (PRS, pass after rectification) counts as an initial fail, as DVSA counts it.

Failure areas and items: a test counts once for an area or item if it had at least one fail-level (Major or Dangerous, or pre-2018 fail) defect in it, however many locations were affected. Advisories and minor defects are not failures.

Adjusted ratio (observed ÷ expected, O/E): indirect standardisation. Each test is given the national failure rate for tests of the same age in whole years, mileage band and fuel; summing those gives the failures a group would have had if it failed like the average comparable car. O/E = actual failures ÷ expected failures, so 1.00 is average for comparable cars and 0.80 means 20% fewer failures. It removes most of the effect of an older or higher-mileage fleet, not differences in how cars are looked after.

Raw rank orders makes by first-time pass rate; adjusted rank by the failure ratio. The difference between the two is mostly fleet age: a make whose cars are young passes more tests whatever its cars are like.

Publication test: At least 20 makes with 20,000+ tests and at least one model with a /mot-reliability page. Makes ranked: 45 (minimum 20).

Limitations

An MOT result records a car's condition on test day. Servicing, owners' habits, annual mileage and where the car is driven all affect it, so a low failure rate is not proof of mechanical reliability or build quality.

A make's ratio mixes all its models and years; the make pages break it down.

Low-volume premium makes (sports and luxury cars) tend to be low-mileage, garage-kept second cars, which the adjustment for mileage band only partly captures.

Citing this study

Cite as: 73 Auto, “Which car makes fail the MOT most? A ranking adjusted for age and mileage”, 2026-09-28, https://73auto.com/research/mot-failures-by-car-make. Based on DVSA anonymised MOT tests and results, Open Government Licence v3.0. The data behind every table is free to reuse with attribution.

More MOT studies

Check the MOT history of the car you're considering

Enter a UK registration to see that car's own MOT results, advisories and what it would cost you to run. Your first check is free and shows the vehicle summary and its headline ownership cost. The category-by-category breakdown is part of a paid check.

UK number plate or 17-character VIN

Where these figures come from

Figures labelled as 73 Auto estimates are our own analysis of these sources, set out in the methodology and data sources. To report a factual error, see corrections.